Vitalik: What We Need to Do Is Not Fight AI, But Create Sanctuaries

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-18Обновлено 2026-05-18

Введение

Vitalik Buterin, in an a16z podcast, addresses the core challenge of the AI era: not to fight AI, but to build "sanctuary technologies" that protect humans without stripping away privacy and agency. He argues the greatest risk is not super-intelligent AI, but humans becoming passive passengers who outsource decisions to centralized systems and AI, leading to a disempowering safety. He redefines Ethereum/crypto's mission as creating such a sanctuary—a parallel, optional space for free coordination, not a fix for the existing system. This becomes crucial as AI and corporate power centralize. Reflecting on his journey from a 19-year-old on "autopilot" to an active "pilot," Vitalik emphasizes that the world reinvents itself every 5-10 years, demanding proactive adaptation. He stresses that active learning is 10x more effective than passive learning, even with equal time. His key advice is to intentionally maintain "manual mode" amidst powerful AI: do tasks yourself, engage in active learning, and avoid total cognitive outsourcing to prevent mental atrophy. For builders, the focus should be on creating tools that preserve human sovereignty, foster serendipity, and keep strategic control. In summary, the AI era demands greater human initiative. True value lies not in computational power, but in active, sovereign individuals who use technology as a tool for agency, not a replacement for it.

Author: Saito

Just finished listening to this episode of Vitalik's podcast on a16z, and it's absolutely packed with insights.

He founded Ethereum at 19, and now in his early 30s, he has shifted from living on "autopilot" to being an "active pilot."

The core topic of this episode is the question we're most anxious about right now: As AI grows increasingly powerful, what should humanity do?

Vitalik's answer is not to "fight AI," but to create sanctuary technologies. These technologies protect us without stripping away our privacy and agency.

Today, I'll break down the hardest counterintuitive points, practical advice, and Ethereum's new positioning from this episode.

The Greatest Risk in the AI Era Is Not AI Being Too Smart, But Humans Being Too Passive

Vitalik states bluntly that the world is less safe and less peaceful now than it was 10 to 15 years ago.

Many people are chasing a kind of "safety": handing everything over to "uncles in the sky"—big companies, super AIs, centralized systems—letting them make decisions, manage risks, and provide protection for us.

But the cost of this safety is the loss of our privacy and agency.

Vitalik calls this safety "disempowering safety"—safety that makes people increasingly powerless.

This is also where he reinterprets the mission of crypto/Ethereum. The significance of Ethereum is not to "fix the dollar" or repair the existing financial system, but to create a new option. You can freely choose to use it or not.

This is what a true sanctuary is: both safe and allowing you to retain sovereignty.

Sanctuary Technologies: Small Spaces That Preserve Human Freedom

Sanctuary Technologies is a term coined by Vitalik himself, and "sanctuary technologies" is a fitting translation.

It's not about turning the entire world into a safe house, nor is it about ruling everyone with a larger system. What it truly aims to do is: give you a safe, small space where you can think, coordinate, and create freely, without being completely controlled by external forces.

It has several core characteristics: not totalizing, not attempting to rule the world; preserving privacy and agency; everyone can freely enter and exit, no coercion.

Ethereum is a typical sanctuary tech. It doesn't try to fix the existing financial system; it gives you a parallel option. Use it if you want, don't if you don't.

This will become increasingly important in the AI era. Because as big companies and super AIs grow stronger, what humanity truly needs is not another system that "arranges everything for you," but spaces that allow you to retain choice.

From Autopilot to Active Pilot: Vitalik's Personal Growth

Reflecting on founding Ethereum at 19, Vitalik says he was largely on autopilot back then.

Many decisions were made by going with the flow: dropping out, writing the whitepaper, getting his visa denied by Ripple, which ironically became a life turning point. He was more like being pushed along by the world then.

But now he increasingly realizes: the world is changing too fast, no one is coming to save you, you must be the pilot yourself.

He gives several relatable examples. Ten years ago, people could go days without contacting friends; now, not replying to a message for a day causes anxiety. Ten years ago, you could genuinely get lost while walking; now, with phone navigation, cities have become a series of "teleportation points."

These changes remind us: the world "dies and is reborn" every 5 to 10 years. If you keep living by the old script, you'll quickly fall behind.

So what's truly important in the AI era is not passively waiting for technology to take you somewhere, but actively deciding how you want to use technology.

The Stronger the AI, the More Humans Need to Stay in "Manual Mode"

Vitalik emphasizes: active learning is 10 times more effective than passive learning, even with the same amount of time spent.

Since childhood, he has forced himself to do many things manually, like doing chemistry without a calculator, walking without navigation. The goal isn't to oppose technology, but to keep the brain engaged.

The stronger the AI, the more we must deliberately preserve some "manual mode."

Sometimes intentionally not using AI to write code, sometimes intentionally walking without navigation, sometimes intentionally not using a chatbot to think through problems for you.

This isn't nostalgia or rejecting efficiency; it's to prevent brain atrophy and maintain one's own agency.

AI can help us with many things, but if all thinking, judgment, and exploration are outsourced, people will gradually become passengers in the system. Vitalik's reminder is: you can use AI, but don't let yourself become utterly dependent on it.

Practical Advice for Builders

The insights Vitalik gives for ordinary builders in this episode are very direct.

First, force yourself to do things manually. Even if AI can help you, do it yourself from time to time to ensure your brain doesn't get rusty.

Second, active learning. Don't just let AI give you answers; derive, verify, and do things yourself.

Third, build sanctuary technologies. Whether you're working on open-source tools, decentralized protocols, or personal knowledge bases, prioritize one thing: does it help people retain sovereignty?

Fourth, don't outsource all brainpower. AI can handle execution, but strategy, direction, and values must be controlled by you.

Fifth, maintain serendipity. Attend more offline events, talk to real people more, don't leave all discoveries to algorithmic recommendations.

These points all point to the same core: the AI era isn't about using fewer tools, but about using tools more actively.

Ethereum's New Positioning: Not Fixing the Old World, But Creating New Options

Vitalik's positioning of crypto is also clear.

Crypto can't solve all the problems of the dollar, nor does it need to pretend it can solve all problems. But it can create something new that doesn't have those flaws.

Everyone can freely choose to use it or not.

This is crypto's greatest strength: it doesn't force you; it gives you a choice.

In an era of increasingly concentrated AI power, this will become increasingly precious. Because as more and more systems try to make decisions for you, filter information for you, and assess risk for you, a parallel, non-coercive option that allows free entry and exit becomes very important in itself.

The value of Ethereum/crypto is not "beating the old world," but giving you a new world you can freely choose.

The Most Counterintuitive Lines from This Episode

The greatest risk in the AI era is not AI replacing humans, but humans willingly turning themselves into passengers.

A sanctuary isn't about making the whole world safe, but giving you a safe, small space where you can still retain freedom.

Active learning is 10 times more effective than passive learning, even with the same time spent.

The world dies and is reborn every 5 to 10 years, and we must be the pilots ourselves.

Inspiration for Ordinary People

The stronger the AI, the more proactive people must be.

Don't outsource all thinking to models. Do more manual things to keep your brain engaged. Participate in building tools that preserve human sovereignty, whether open-source, decentralized, or personal knowledge management systems.

Remember: technology ultimately serves humanity; it doesn't replace it.

Vitalik concludes by saying that we humans are the brightest stars. AI can be strong, but what truly drives the world forward are active, agentic people.

One-Sentence Summary

Vitalik, drawing on his 10 years of personal experience, tells us: the AI era is not an era to lie back, but an era that requires humans to be even more proactive pilots.

Don't outsource your brain to models. Do more manual things, build sanctuary technologies, and preserve your privacy and agency.

My biggest takeaway from this episode is: we used to fear AI taking our jobs, but now it seems AI is actually upgrading humans from "executors" to "designers."

What's truly scarce has never been computing power, but people willing to think actively and retain sovereignty.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to Vitalik, what is the core purpose of 'Sanctuary Technologies'?

AThe core purpose of 'Sanctuary Technologies' is to provide safe spaces where people can freely think, coordinate, and create while preserving their privacy and agency. They are not designed to dominate or fix the entire world, but to offer a voluntary, non-compulsory alternative, giving people a choice in an era of increasingly centralized power from large corporations and super-AI.

QWhat is the main risk of the 'disempowering safety' that Vitalik warns against in the AI era?

AThe main risk of 'disempowering safety' is that it makes humans increasingly passive and powerless. By handing over decisions, risk management, and protection to centralized entities like big companies or super-AI, individuals lose their privacy and agency. The article argues the biggest danger is not AI being too smart, but humans willingly turning themselves into passive passengers.

QHow does Vitalik's view of Ethereum's mission differ from simply 'fixing' the existing financial system?

AVitalik's view is that Ethereum's mission is not to 'fix' the existing financial system (like the US dollar), but to create a new, parallel option. Its power lies in giving people the freedom to choose whether to use it or not, offering an alternative without the flaws of the old system. This approach of providing voluntary choice, rather than enforced replacement, is its key strength.

QWhat practical advice does Vitalik offer for builders and individuals to maintain agency in the AI age?

AVitalik offers several practical pieces of advice: 1) Force yourself to do things manually at times to keep your mind sharp. 2) Engage in active learning (self-driven exploration) rather than just passively accepting AI answers. 3) Build tools that prioritize preserving human sovereignty. 4) Do not outsource all strategic and creative thinking to AI. 5) Maintain serendipity through real-world interactions.

QWhat does Vitalik mean by saying 'the world dies and gets reborn every 5 to 10 years' and its implication for individuals?

AVitalik means that the world undergoes fundamental transformations every 5-10 years, making old patterns of living obsolete. The implication for individuals is that they cannot rely on an old 'script' or be passive. To keep up and thrive, people must actively 'pilot' their own lives, make conscious choices about how to use technology, and continuously adapt, rather than being passively carried along by change.

Похожее

How Did Institutions Adjust Their Crypto Asset Holdings in Q1? Who Increased and Who Exited?

The Q1 2026 13F filings reveal a sharply divided picture of institutional activity in crypto assets. Sovereign wealth funds and bank capital increased exposure, while major endowment funds notably de-risked. The most significant buying came from the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund Mubadala, which expanded its position in the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT). JPMorgan Chase dramatically increased its IBIT exposure by 174%, with other global banks like RBC, Scotiabank, and Barclays also adding to Bitcoin ETF holdings, while using options for asymmetric protection. Conversely, the Harvard Management Company (Harvard University's endowment), once a major academic holder, cut its IBIT position by 43% and fully exited a BlackRock Ethereum ETF. The reallocated capital flowed into traditional assets like TSMC, Microsoft, and gold. Other Ivy League endowments showed varied strategies: Brown and Dartmouth maintained Bitcoin positions, with Dartmouth making a nuanced shift by moving Ethereum exposure to a staking ETF and adding a Solana staking ETF to capture yield. Hedge fund Jane Street significantly reduced Bitcoin ETF holdings, locking in profits, while Wells Fargo increased its Ethereum stake. Overall, institutions are deploying traditional capital market tactics—buying, selling, hedging, and rotating—within crypto via spot ETFs. The Q2 reports will be crucial to determine if Harvard's retreat is an outlier or the start of a broader trend among endowments.

marsbit19 мин. назад

How Did Institutions Adjust Their Crypto Asset Holdings in Q1? Who Increased and Who Exited?

marsbit19 мин. назад

Blockchain Capital Partner: Most People Have a Narrow Understanding of the On-Chain Economy

Author Spencer Bogart, a partner at Blockchain Capital, argues that most people have a narrow view of the on-chain economy, seeing it primarily as a faster, cheaper version of existing financial systems. While this represents a significant opportunity, he believes it's only a small part of the story. Bogart compares the current state of crypto to the early internet, where email was the obvious "faster mail" application. The truly transformative categories—like search, social media, and cloud computing—were entirely new and unimaginable beforehand. Similarly, the most profound innovations in crypto will not be incremental improvements but entirely new categories enabled by the core properties of public blockchains: atomic execution, shared global state, programmable custody, and composability. He cites the "flash loan" as a prime example of a "new verb"—a financial action structurally impossible before programmable assets and atomic settlement. It allows for uncollateralized, trustless borrowing of any size, provided repayment occurs within the same transaction, enabling novel strategies like arbitrage and collateral swaps. Bogart admits the difficulty in precisely predicting these future innovations, as human imagination tends to extrapolate from the past. He posits that the most exciting applications in ten years will be things that don't exist today and have no precedent—products only possible in a global, composable, always-on environment with programmable assets. While the exploration of this vast design space will involve many failures, the potential for transformative, category-defining breakthroughs is what makes the next decade so promising.

链捕手48 мин. назад

Blockchain Capital Partner: Most People Have a Narrow Understanding of the On-Chain Economy

链捕手48 мин. назад

Cloud PC Gets a Second Chance, Google/Alibaba/Microsoft Battle for Cloud AI Dominance

Google unexpectedly announced "Android Computer," a new high-end productivity-focused PC series, positioning cloud AI as its core rather than an add-on. This move signals a potential revival for the "cloud computer" concept in the AI era. The article argues that current "AI PCs" are essentially traditional Windows machines with AI features grafted on, heavily reliant on cloud AI for complex tasks due to limited local consumer-grade hardware capabilities. This reliance raises questions about the value of premium local AI hardware. Cloud computers, which struggled with latency-sensitive applications like cloud gaming, are seen as a natural fit for AI PCs due to AI's higher tolerance for response time. Google's Android Computer deeply integrates AI (powered by its Gemini model) into the OS interface, making it contextually available. Its hardware-agnostic approach (supporting both x86 and ARM chips) further underscores the shift towards cloud-centric AI. Other players are adapting: Cloud service providers like Alibaba are enhancing their AI cloud computer offerings; chipmakers (Intel, AMD) are focusing on data center AI chips; traditional PC brands are adding AI software layers; and Apple is leveraging its ecosystem and affordable hardware. Microsoft is defining AI PC standards, embedding Copilot (powered by GPT and Bing) into Windows, and also relying on cloud AI. In conclusion, Android Computer challenges the traditional PC form factor by proposing a "light local, heavy cloud" model. This approach appears promising amid rising hardware costs and local compute bottlenecks. The future PC market will involve a multifaceted competition around cloud integration, OS-level AI, and cross-device ecosystems, potentially redefining the PC as a screen and network conduit to cloud-based AI productivity.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Cloud PC Gets a Second Chance, Google/Alibaba/Microsoft Battle for Cloud AI Dominance

marsbit1 ч. назад

Encrypted ETF Weekly Report | Last Week, US Bitcoin Spot ETF Net Outflow $9.95 Billion; US Ethereum Spot ETF Net Outflow $255 Million

Last week, U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw significant net outflows totaling $995 million over three days, with a major contribution of $317 million from BlackRock's IBIT. Their total net asset value (NAV) stands at $104.2 billion. U.S. Ethereum spot ETFs also experienced net outflows of $255 million over five days, largely from BlackRock's ETHA ($186 million out), bringing their total NAV to $12.93 billion. In Hong Kong, Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded a net outflow of 24.91 BTC, reducing their NAV to $323 million. Hong Kong's Ethereum spot ETFs saw no inflows, with an NAV of $68.13 million. U.S. Bitcoin spot ETF options showed increased activity, with a total nominal trading volume of $797 million and a put/call trading ratio of 1.63, indicating a bullish market sentiment. The total open interest reached $23.08 billion. Key developments include VanEck and Grayscale simultaneously filing amended proposals for BNB ETFs, signaling potential SEC review progress. Grayscale also filed for the first U.S. privacy coin ETF (Zcash). Avenir Group remains Asia's largest institutional holder of Bitcoin ETFs. 21Shares launched an actively managed crypto ETF (TKNS), and Bitwise's Hyperliquid ETF (BHYP) is set to list on the NYSE. Institutional activity varied: JPMorgan dramatically increased its Bitcoin ETF holdings (IBIT up 174%), while Jane Street significantly reduced its exposure (IBIT down 71%). Dartmouth College disclosed holdings of $7.7M in Bitcoin ETF and $3.4M in a Solana ETF.

链捕手1 ч. назад

Encrypted ETF Weekly Report | Last Week, US Bitcoin Spot ETF Net Outflow $9.95 Billion; US Ethereum Spot ETF Net Outflow $255 Million

链捕手1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

2025 год — год институциональных инвесторов, в будущем он будет доминировать в приложениях реального времени.

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.12.16Обновлено 2025.12.16

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на AI (AI) представлены ниже.

活动图片