Why Ripple’s XRP Is A Better Transaction Choice Compared To SWIFT

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-16Last updated on 2026-05-16

Abstract

Crypto expert CharuSan argues that Ripple's XRP is superior to SWIFT for cross-border transactions, predicting SWIFT may need to integrate XRP to survive. He highlights XRP's On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) technology as faster and cheaper, freeing up trillions for banks instantly, while SWIFT is described as cumbersome and slow. CharuSan states that banks' main software is already integrated with Ripple, enabling rapid, widespread adoption. He believes SWIFT must adopt XRP as a liquidity layer to remain relevant, rather than staying a simple messaging service. While SWIFT is developing a distributed ledger on Ethereum's Linea with partners, CharuSan dismisses this move, noting Linea handles messaging trials but isn't a liquidity solution and incurs verification costs on Ethereum, making it non-viable for payments. In conclusion, CharuSan asserts that without integrating XRP, SWIFT is "doomed" to fade away. At the time of writing, XRP price was around $1.41.

Crypto pundit CharuSan has explained why Ripple’s XRP is a better choice for cross-border transactions than SWIFT. He also predicted that SWIFT is likely to integrate XRP at some point to avoid becoming redundant.

Why Ripple’s XRP Has A Competitive Edge Over SWIFT

In an X post, CharuSan said that SWIFT is cumbersome and slow, and will completely lose its competitive edge against XRP’s ODL technology, which frees up trillions of dollars for banks in seconds. He further noted that XRP addresses these banks’ pain points by enabling faster, cheaper payments, prompting them to reconsider their use of SWIFT.

In line with this, he opined that XRP will take over the market rapidly rather than gradually. The pundit also mentioned that the main software used by banks is already integrated with Ripple, which means that the technical path is ready. CharuSan added that there is no need to meet with 13,000 banks one by one, as a single update will integrate all banks into the system.

CharuSan noted that the real issue for SWIFT is whether it will add XRP to its system as a liquidity layer to keep up with the modern world or remain as a simple messaging service, which could cause it to lose its financial authority and eventually pack up. As such, he believes that SWIFT’s adoption of XRP’s technology at some point is a strategic necessity for the firm’s survival.

However, it is worth noting that SWIFT is developing its distributed ledger on Ethereum layer-2 Linea in partnership with ConsenSys and up to 30 banks. This is part of the firm’s move to expand from solely the messaging layer to an execution layer, enabling 24/7 cross-border payments.

Why The Linea Move Cannot Compare to Using XRP

CharuSan also opined that SWIFT cannot compete with XRP even with its move to develop a distributed ledger on Linea. He explained that Linea is a layer-2 infrastructure, and SWIFT’s experimentation with these networks is limited to messaging and asset-transfer trials. The pundit added that Linea is not a liquidity tool.

As such, CharuSan noted that although Linea aggregates transactions on its own, it still sends this data to the Ethereum network for verification, incurring a cost in the process. He indicated that such a process is not viable for cross-border payments, and so, SWIFT cannot compete with or be compared to XRP. The pundit reiterated that if SWIFT does not reach an agreement with Ripple and integrate XRP as a liquidity layer on its platform, it is “doomed” to fade away.

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $1.41, down over 4% in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP trading at $1.41 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason CharuSan believes Ripple's XRP is superior to SWIFT for cross-border transactions?

ACharuSan believes XRP is superior because its ODL (On-Demand Liquidity) technology enables faster and cheaper cross-border payments, freeing up trillions of dollars for banks in seconds, unlike the slow and cumbersome SWIFT system.

QWhat does the article suggest is a strategic necessity for SWIFT's survival?

AThe article suggests that for SWIFT's survival, it is a strategic necessity to adopt XRP's technology, specifically by integrating XRP as a liquidity layer on its platform to keep up with modern financial demands.

QAccording to the article, why is SWIFT's development of a distributed ledger on Ethereum's Linea not a direct competitor to XRP?

ASWIFT's Linea initiative is not a direct competitor to XRP because Linea is a layer-2 infrastructure focused on messaging and asset-transfer trials, not a liquidity tool. Its process still relies on the Ethereum network for verification, incurring costs and making it non-viable for efficient cross-border payments.

QWhat technical advantage does Ripple's XRP have for bank integration, as mentioned by CharuSan?

ACharuSan mentions that the main software used by banks is already integrated with Ripple, meaning the technical path is ready, and a single software update could integrate all banks into the XRP system, eliminating the need for individual negotiations with thousands of banks.

QWhat was the price of XRP and its performance at the time the article was written?

AAt the time of writing, the XRP price was trading at around $1.41, down over 4% in the last 24 hours according to data from CoinMarketCap.

Related Reads

MY Group Completes Web4.0 First Stock Listing Layout, SEC Officially Discloses Form 8-K Announcement

MY Group has completed the listing layout for the "Web4.0 First Share," with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) formally disclosing a Form 8-K report. According to the filing, the company's board has officially appointed Mr. Zhang Dingwen as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Executive Director, marking a significant upgrade in management and the entry into a new phase of its global capital market strategy. The disclosure of Form 8-K, used for reporting major corporate events, coincides with market information indicating the company is advancing several key capital market initiatives. These include a global brand system upgrade, corporate strategic restructuring, and a change of its stock ticker symbol. These moves are viewed by industry experts as signals of accelerated internationalization and enhanced global market presence. Concurrently, MY Group's proposed "Web4.0 Ecosystem" is garnering market attention. The company is integrating core capabilities across social traffic portals, global payment systems, public blockchain infrastructure, digital asset trading, and AI-powered financial systems. Analysts suggest that by closing this ecosystem loop, MY Group has the potential to become a next-generation platform merging Web2 user scale with Web3 asset frameworks and AI financial capabilities. With the management upgrade finalized, the global brand strategy launched, and the stock ticker change pending, MY Group is positioning itself as a focal point in the global technology capital market as a potential leading Web4.0 platform enterprise.

marsbit3h ago

MY Group Completes Web4.0 First Stock Listing Layout, SEC Officially Discloses Form 8-K Announcement

marsbit3h ago

In the AI Era, How to Onboard Without Starting from Scratch

In the AI era, onboarding new employees often resembles a botched relay race baton handoff, where the organization maintains speed while the newcomer starts from zero. The author, after joining Ramp, argues the core problem is a lack of accessible, shared organizational "context"—the collective knowledge from meetings, documents, Slack discussions, and decisions. Instead of relying on slow, manual onboarding or isolated AI tools, the solution is building a continuously updated "company brain." This system acts as a central, AI-native knowledge base that absorbs all company signals. The author describes building a prototype using an Obsidian vault powered by Claude, fed by automated meeting transcripts and notes, and topped with reusable agent "skills." The current enterprise AI approach, deploying specific workflow agents, is likened to the "chatbot era"—useful but disconnected. The real gap is the absence of a shared brain that all agents and employees can access from day one. The future lies in making context layer infrastructure the priority: write context first, then install tools; record every meeting; build the wiki before the dashboard. When new hires, AI agents, and even customers can immediately access this living company brain, the costly "ramp-up" period becomes obsolete. True organizational speed is achieved when maximum velocity and seamless context transfer happen simultaneously.

marsbit5h ago

In the AI Era, How to Onboard Without Starting from Scratch

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片