# Fintech Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Fintech", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Cross-Border Payment Giant Wise Lands on NASDAQ

Fintech company Wise has successfully listed its A-class shares on the Nasdaq stock exchange under the ticker "WSE," while maintaining its secondary listing on the London Stock Exchange. This move, more of a primary listing transfer to the US than a traditional IPO, reflects Wise's strategic shift to be closer to a key growth market, attract a broader investor base, and support its business evolution. Founded in London by two Estonians to solve personal pain points with costly and opaque international bank transfers, Wise initially grew as TransferWise by offering faster, cheaper, and more transparent currency exchange and cross-border payments. It has since expanded beyond a simple transfer tool into a comprehensive global financial services platform, offering multi-currency accounts, business services, debit cards, and the Wise Platform, which provides its infrastructure to banks and other institutions. Wise's latest fiscal year data highlights its scale: $243 billion in cross-border transaction volume, $39 billion in customer balances, and nearly 19 million customers. The company continues to emphasize its low average fee of 0.52% and fast transaction speeds, with 75% of payments arriving within 20 seconds. The Nasdaq listing aligns with Wise's ambitions in the US market, where it aims to grow its consumer and business user base and, critically, deepen partnerships with American banks through Wise Platform. To further strengthen its US operations, Wise is reportedly seeking a national trust bank charter and a Federal Reserve master account to gain more direct control over USD payment flows. The transition also involved corporate governance discussions, as the move was approved alongside an extension of its dual-class share structure, which grants founders enhanced voting rights. In summary, Wise's Nasdaq debut marks its transition from a disruptive money transfer startup into a major global payments network player. Its future growth will be tested on its ability to scale its platform business, execute its US strategy, and maintain profitability and governance standards under the scrutiny of public markets.

marsbitYesterday 01:18

Cross-Border Payment Giant Wise Lands on NASDAQ

marsbitYesterday 01:18

Cross-Border Payments Giant Wise Lists on NASDAQ

Cross-border payment giant Wise has successfully transitioned its primary listing to Nasdaq (ticker: WSE), retaining a secondary listing in London. Starting trading on May 11, 2026, the company opened at $15.40, up approximately 6.21%. With a market valuation around $15.5 billion, this move signifies Wise's evolution from a low-cost international money transfer tool into a comprehensive global financial services platform. Founded by Taavet Hinrikus and Kristo Käärmann to solve personal frustrations with expensive and opaque bank fees, Wise (formerly TransferWise) pioneered transparent, low-cost foreign exchange and transfers. For its fiscal year ending March 31, 2026, Wise reported $243 billion in cross-border transaction volume, $39 billion in customer balances, $1.9 billion in transaction revenue, and $2.5 billion in net revenue, serving nearly 19 million personal and business customers. The strategic shift to a US primary listing aims to deepen investor reach, enhance liquidity, and align with the United States as a critical growth market. It supports Wise's broader business narrative, which now encompasses multi-currency accounts, business solutions, debit cards, and especially its B2B offering, Wise Platform. This platform allows banks and financial institutions like Itaú and Nubank to integrate Wise's payment infrastructure, with a long-term goal for it to drive over 50% of cross-border volume. Concurrently, Wise is strengthening its US operational capabilities, including applying for a national trust bank charter and a Federal Reserve master account to gain greater control over USD payment flows. While Wise facilitates payments into China via partners like Alipay, outbound RMB services rely on collaboration with licensed local payment institutions, adhering to regional regulations. The listing process included a controversial proposal to extend a dual-class share structure, highlighting governance challenges as the company balances founder influence with public market accountability. Moving forward, Wise must demonstrate to US investors that its low-fee model is sustainable and scalable, that Wise Platform can drive significant growth, and that its global compliance and network infrastructure can support its ambition to become an integral part of the worldwide money movement landscape.

链捕手Yesterday 01:15

Cross-Border Payments Giant Wise Lists on NASDAQ

链捕手Yesterday 01:15

Bear Market Financial Report Comparison: Pure Crypto Exchanges vs. Multi-Asset Platforms, Robinhood More Resilient Than Coinbase

Bear Market Earnings Showcase the Resilience of Multi-Asset Platforms vs. Crypto-Only Exchanges Coinbase and Robinhood's recent earnings reports, both missing expectations and erasing $12 billion in market value, highlight a core vulnerability of exchange models in a crypto downturn: heavy reliance on transaction fees. Coinbase's Q1 revenue fell 31% to $1.41 billion, with a net loss of $394 million, driven by a 40% drop in transaction revenue as spot trading volumes plummeted. While its subscription and services segment (44% of revenue) offers some buffer, key components like stablecoin revenue remain tied to trading activity. In contrast, Robinhood reported a 15% revenue increase to $1.07 billion, with net income of $350 million. Although its crypto trading revenue fell 47%, this was offset by strong growth in other areas: prediction market revenue surged 320%, stock revenue grew 46%, and options revenue rose 8%. This diversification, with transaction revenue still at 58% of the total, made Robinhood more resilient. The analysis extends to platforms like Revolut, where payments and banking are central. In 2025, Revolut's revenue grew 45% to $6.1 billion, evenly spread across segments. Its wealth segment (including crypto, stocks, and CFDs) constituted just 15% of revenue, making it far less exposed to crypto market cycles than Coinbase or even Robinhood. The key takeaway is that platforms with diversified, non-correlated revenue streams—particularly through derivatives, prediction markets, or core banking services—are better insulated during crypto bear markets. Robinhood's asset variety acts as a hedge, while Coinbase's heavier exposure to spot crypto trading leaves it more vulnerable to prolonged downturns.

marsbit05/14 10:33

Bear Market Financial Report Comparison: Pure Crypto Exchanges vs. Multi-Asset Platforms, Robinhood More Resilient Than Coinbase

marsbit05/14 10:33

Why Hasn't the U.S. Seen the Rise of 'Huabei' or 'Jiebei'?

The article explores why the U.S. lacks large-scale consumer credit products like China's "Huabei" and "Jiebei," despite having a developed financial sector. Key reasons include: 1. **Structural Barriers**: A fragmented federal and state regulatory system, reinforced by post-2008 reforms like the Dodd-Frank Act, raises compliance costs and protects traditional banks, stifling fintech innovation. 2. **Credit Card Dominance**: Credit cards, used by 70-80% of adults, form a $1.28 trillion debt market with high APRs (avg. 22.3%). This system cross-subsidizes users who pay in full with those carrying balances, creating a predatory yet entrenched ecosystem. 3. **Data Privacy Laws**: Strict regulations (e.g., FCRA, CCPA) prevent tech giants from leveraging behavioral data for credit scoring, unlike in China where such data fuels fintech models. 4. **Capital Market Disincentives**: Wall Street penalizes tech firms entering finance due to lower valuations associated with heavy regulation and risk, as seen in Apple’s failure with Apple Card. 5. **Banking Oligopoly**: Major banks control consumer lending, leveraging lobbying power and consumer habits to maintain high-cost credit, while alternatives like payday loans (400% APR) or "unbanked" services remain niche or exploitative. Ultimately, regulatory, structural, and corporate interests collectively block the emergence of accessible, low-cost digital lending in the U.S.

Odaily星球日报04/24 04:11

Why Hasn't the U.S. Seen the Rise of 'Huabei' or 'Jiebei'?

Odaily星球日报04/24 04:11

活动图片