Is Washington About To Kill Crypto Prediction Markets For Good? — Why Congress Suddenly Cares

bitcoinist2026-03-26 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-03-26 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

On March 25, two separate acts were introduced to ban U.S. congressional staff, members of Congress, and federal officials from trading on prediction markets. Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts issued an immediate office-wide ban, calling these markets “playgrounds for corrupt insiders” that create perverse incentives. Separately, Representatives Adrian Smith and Nikki Budzinski introduced the bipartisan PREDICT Act, which would prohibit elected officials, senior appointees, and their families from trading on political and policy outcome markets. Violators would face a 10% fine on the value of the trade and forfeiture of profits. The moves reflect growing concern in Washington over insider trading risks in prediction markets, especially following instances of traders making large profits on geopolitical events. These actions may lead to stricter regulations and increased scrutiny on crypto-based prediction platforms.

Two different acts banning congressional staff, members of congress and federal officials from trading on prediction markets were introduced on Wednesday, March 25, one of them being effective immediately.

Massachusetts Bans Crypto Prediction Market

Washington’s battle against prediction markets rages on. Following a bipartisan Senate bill introduced on Monday that targets sports‐style bets on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, democratic representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts (MA-06) formally banned all of his staff from “participating in prediction markets”, such as the aforementioned, “to trade or hold positions on political, legislative, regulatory, geopolitical outcomes, or any information that is learned in an official capacity”. The press release frames it as the first such explicit office-wide ban in Congress.

Moulton’s rationale is clear: staff are meant to serve constituents, not profit from policy choices and global events. As he views it, prediction markets have become ethically questionable “playgrounds for corrupt insiders”:

Prediction markets have become a playground for corrupt insiders who are able to place bets on things like election outcomes, wars, and even the deaths of public figures. This is creating a perverse incentive structure that poses a genuine threat to American society today.

Congressional staff and the Members they work for exist to serve the constituents of the districts they represent, not to profit off of the very policy decisions and world events that we are here to respond to.

Nebraska Bans Crypto Prediction Market Too

On Nebraska’s side, Congressman Adrian Smith (R-NE-03) and Congresswoman Nikki Budzinski (D-IL-13) introduced the Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Congressional Trading Act (PREDICT Act), another bipartisan effort that aims to ban members of Congress, their spouses and children, the president and vice president, and senior appointees from trading on political and policy outcome markets.

Their core argument and statement are very similar to Moulton’s. Recent episodes of little‐known traders making massive profits on contracts tied to war with Iran or the length of government shutdowns have sharpened fears about insider information leaking into these markets. Smith said:

Serving the American people is a privilege, not a pathway to profit. Our commonsense, bipartisan bill will give Americans confidence that the decisions of their elected officials are guided by merit, not personal profit.

Budzinski added:

The American people are tired of politicians using their influence for personal gain, and the rise of prediction markets has made those concerns even more relevant. In recent months, we’ve seen instances of little-known traders making massive profits on events ranging from war with Iran to how long a government shutdown will last, raising necessary questions about the use of inside information.

Breaking the PREDICT Act would trigger a civil fine equal to 10% of the value of the banned trade, plus a requirement to hand over all profits from it to the U.S. Treasury, the announcement states.

A Growing Concern For Washington?

These new episodes come on top of earlier efforts like Rep. Ritchie Torres’s Financial Prediction Markets Public Integrity Act, following the capture of Venezuela’s former dictator Nicolás Maduro, which also targeted insider trading on platforms such as Polymarket.

For on‐chain and offshore prediction markets, a hard ban on US officials could actually de‐risk the space by reducing headline “insider” scandals, but it also raises the odds of stricter KYC and monitoring requirements in the US.

As it becomes increasingly clear that Washington has its attention set on ethically questionable crypto ventures, it is not too far-fetched to think that similar logic could be extended to other high‐beta crypto venues where policy and profit visibly collide (e.g., tokens tightly linked to election or war outcomes). Traders would do well pricing in regulatory overhang alongside usual market risk.

BTC’s price drops slightly after reaching $71k yesterday, trading for around $69k today. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview

Cover image from Perplexity, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the main reason cited by Representative Seth Moulton for banning his staff from participating in prediction markets?

AMoulton believes staff should serve constituents, not profit from policy choices and global events, and views prediction markets as ethically questionable 'playgrounds for corrupt insiders'.

QWhat is the name of the bipartisan act introduced by Congressman Adrian Smith and Congresswoman Nikki Budzinski to ban trading on political prediction markets?

AThe Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Congressional Trading Act (PREDICT Act).

QWhat are the penalties for violating the PREDICT Act according to the announcement?

AA civil fine equal to 10% of the value of the banned trade, plus a requirement to hand over all profits from it to the U.S. Treasury.

QWhich earlier legislative effort targeted insider trading on platforms like Polymarket, as mentioned in the article?

ARep. Ritchie Torres's Financial Prediction Markets Public Integrity Act.

QHow might a hard ban on US officials using prediction markets affect the crypto prediction market space?

AIt could de-risk the space by reducing headline 'insider' scandals but also increase the likelihood of stricter KYC and monitoring requirements in the US.

İlgili Okumalar

This Chip Sector Is on Fire

The global AI chip market is undergoing a significant paradigm shift, with ASICs (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits) emerging from a niche to a mainstream force, challenging the long-held dominance of GPUs in AI training. This "golden era" for ASICs is primarily driven by the industry's pivot from training to inference, where the cost and energy efficiency advantages of custom chips become critical for scaling to billions of users. Key signals include Google's TPU capturing 78% of its AI server shipments in Q1 2026, OpenAI's plans for a massive custom ASIC cluster with Broadcom, and cloud providers (CSPs) increasingly favoring in-house or custom designs for supply chain control and cost efficiency. Market forecasts are bullish: AI ASIC revenue is projected to hit $300 billion by 2027, with a 34% CAGR, potentially reaching a 45% share of the AI chip market. The competitive landscape is expanding beyond traditional leaders Broadcom and Marvell. MediaTek is aggressively targeting the data center ASIC market, projecting over $10 billion in 2026 revenue, while Qualcomm, leveraging its AlphaWave acquisition, is launching customized inference chips. These mobile chip giants are leveraging their SoC design expertise for a cloud-side transition. In China, companies like VeriSilicon and ASR Microelectronics are capitalizing on this trend as pivotal "enablers," providing full-stack ASIC design services and experiencing explosive order growth, particularly for cloud-side AI projects. However, challenges remain: high development costs, software ecosystem gaps compared to NVIDIA's CUDA, dependency on advanced packaging capacity (like TSMC's CoWoS), and the fundamental trade-off between customization and flexibility. The future is not a simple replacement of GPUs by ASICs but a more specialized coexistence. The consensus points toward "GPUs for training, ASICs for inference," or hybrid clusters. Ultimately, the rise of ASICs represents a democratization of computing power, shifting definition authority from a single chip giant to a broader ecosystem of cloud providers and end-users, offering the industry more choice in the silicon that powers AI.

marsbit5 dk önce

This Chip Sector Is on Fire

marsbit5 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片