涉及超13.7万枚比特币,Mt.Gox清偿窗口即将打开,债权人会如何获得赔偿?

PanewsPublicado a 2023-03-07Actualizado a 2023-03-07

Resumen

耗时九年的Mt.Gox“门头沟”被盗事件总算要“剧终”了,究竟会怎么赔付?市场是否会面临被砸风险?

历经多次推迟清算及数场官司,Mt. Gox被盗事件总算进入赔付阶段,其债权人有望在今年3月获得首批还款。而在过去九年时间里,比特币价格的飙涨也让Mt. Gox债权人在多年“被动锁仓”后,强制获得一笔不小的“意外收入”。

“”

但当前债权人更为关心的是,Mt.Gox的真实财务状况如何?究竟会怎么赔付?何时会收到偿还款?另外,一旦用于偿还债权人的近14万枚比特币被释放,市场是否会面临被砸风险?

“”

Mt.Gox的清偿方式:基础偿付和比例偿付

“”

从申请破产清算到确定赔付方案,再到最终准备还款,这场耗时九年的Mt.Gox“门头沟”被盗事件总算要“剧终”了。

“”

根据2019年Mt.Gox的资产负债表显示,其债务人持有约14.2万枚比特币(BTC)、14.3万枚比特币现金(BCH)及690亿日元(约5.1亿美元)。有债权人透露,此后的Mt.Gox资产负债表并没有出现太大变化。而Token Unlocks截至3月6日最新数据显示,Mt.Gox持有超13.7万枚比特币,价值共30.8亿美元。

“”

根据Mt.Gox官网公告,债权人要想获得赔偿,需在2023年3月10日前登记并选择还款方式,首批赔付的最后期限为2023年9月30日。如果未能在截止时间内完成登记和注册,这部分债权人将无法获得提前一次性还款,且失去部分加密货币恢复索赔、银行汇款支付或通过资金转账服务提供商汇款的权利。此外,他们还需要携带所需的文件前往MTGOX Co., Ltd. 总部,仅能以日元的现金形式接受还款。

“”

而Mt.Gox面向债权人提供的最新偿付方案包括基础偿付和比例偿付。基础偿付部分允许每个债权人索赔的前20万日元将以日元支付,比例偿付则为债权人提供了两种灵活选择,即“早期一次性还款”或“中期还款和终期还款”。其中,一次性还款的赔付方式仅能让债权人获得部分赔付(黑客攻击时他们锁定在平台上的资金约为21%),超过20万日元的部分可允许债权人选择BTC、BCH和日元的混合方式或者以法定货币支付全部金额。据一位债权人透露,比例大概为71%的加密货币和29%的现金。

“”

例如,Mt.Gox最大债权人Bitcoinica和MGIF就选择了一次性支付方案,且选择主要以比特币而非法定货币的形式来获得其破产追偿,这也大大降低了市场对Mt.Gox大量抛售比特币来支付法币赔付款的担忧,要知道这两大债权人所需的索赔金额约占全部的五分之一。

“”

“中期还款和终期还款”则较前一种方式的偿还额更多,但仅在9月30日获得中期付款,终期付款将在未来几年内支付。而部分债权人要想获得更高比例的偿付,还可继续等待诉讼结果,这意味着他们需要等到更长的时间才能收到付款,MGIF曾在2022年的一份备忘录中表示,这个过程可能需要五至九年的时间

“”

值得一提的是,由于债权人须注册并指定一家交易所代表他们接收资金,而每家交易所针对处理付款的速度给出了不同的时间表,因此他们获得赔偿的时间也不相同,比如BitGo将在20天内进行付款、Kraken的付款程序可能需要90天等。

“”

加密市场不会面临集中砸盘

“”

2014年,作为曾占比特币交易量70%的全球第一大交易所,Mt.Gox被曝遭遇黑客攻击,共有10万枚比特币及用户75万枚比特币被盗(后找回20万枚比特币并陆续抛售月6万枚)用户资产一夜之间“灰飞烟灭”,3天后Mt.Gox申请破产。回忆这起“门头沟事件”,至今仍让很多投资者心有余悸。

“”

而彼时,比特币的价格大概为800美元,而多年后其价格已直线飞涨,最高曾涨至超5万美元,即便是当前1.7万美元的价格,也较2014年翻了超21.8倍。如此高的回报率之下,难保有不少债权人选择抛售提现,而目前Mt. Gox可用的比特币数量占当前比特币日交易量(63.2万枚)的21.6% ,那么如此体量的比特币是否对市场产生冲击?

“”

对此,瑞银策略师Ivan Kachkovski表示,即将到来的Mt. Gox破产还款可能不会引起人们对比特币价格的担忧。Mt. Gox为债权人提供了多种还款方式和时间选择,且大多数债权人仍是加密货币信徒,因此不太可能抛售比特币。但Mt. Gox采用法定还款的早期一次性付款选项将导致交易所出售比特币以筹集必要的现金,并可能让“长期以来担心Mt.Gox赎回会损害比特币价格”成为现实。

“”

虽然首次赔偿的债权人及比特币数量尚未可知,但Mt. Gox完成所有的数据统计预计还需要一定时间,且债权人的偿还方式有着多种形式及是多阶段的,甚至部分为获得更多赔偿还需耗费几年时间,这意味着这部分比特币的释放量或将不会非常集中,并不会造成非常集中的市场冲击。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Dumping US Bonds, Buying Japanese Bonds: Wall Street Prepares for 'Capital Repatriation to Japan'

Wall Street is bracing for a potential "great repatriation" of Japanese capital as yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs) soar to multi-decade highs. The 10-year JGB yield recently hit 2.73%, its highest since 1997, while the 30-year yield broke 4% for the first time. This dramatic shift is causing global asset managers to reassess a long-ignored risk: that Japanese investors, who hold roughly $1 trillion in U.S. Treasury debt, could start bringing that money home. For decades, Japan's ultra-low interest rates pushed domestic insurers, pension funds, and banks to seek yield overseas, primarily in U.S. Treasuries. Now, with the Bank of Japan hiking rates and JGB yields climbing, the incentive is reversing. Firms like BlueBay Asset Management are preparing for this shift, believing new Japanese investments will be directed domestically rather than to foreign bonds. Early signs of repatriation are emerging, with record monthly inflows into Japanese sovereign bond funds in March. Some managers, like Ruffer's Matt Smith, hold yen as a hedge, anticipating that market stress could trigger a rapid acceleration of capital returning to Japan. However, analysts caution that a mass exodus hasn't begun yet. Japanese investors were still net buyers of foreign bonds over the past year. Uncertainty remains high as Japan's government fiscal plans could push JGB yields even higher, making investors hesitant to buy immediately. Furthermore, the Bank of Japan's withdrawal as a dominant bond buyer has increased market volatility. Nevertheless, the potential scale of Japanese selling poses a tangible risk to the U.S. Treasury market. As the largest foreign holder of U.S. debt, any sustained shift by Japanese institutions could materially impact supply and demand dynamics, pushing U.S. yields higher. Wall Street's current positioning is a forward-looking bet on this logic becoming increasingly compelling as Japanese yields continue to rise.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Dumping US Bonds, Buying Japanese Bonds: Wall Street Prepares for 'Capital Repatriation to Japan'

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

How Did Institutions Adjust Their Crypto Asset Holdings in Q1? Who Increased and Who Exited?

The Q1 2026 13F filings reveal a sharply divided picture of institutional activity in crypto assets. Sovereign wealth funds and bank capital increased exposure, while major endowment funds notably de-risked. The most significant buying came from the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund Mubadala, which expanded its position in the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT). JPMorgan Chase dramatically increased its IBIT exposure by 174%, with other global banks like RBC, Scotiabank, and Barclays also adding to Bitcoin ETF holdings, while using options for asymmetric protection. Conversely, the Harvard Management Company (Harvard University's endowment), once a major academic holder, cut its IBIT position by 43% and fully exited a BlackRock Ethereum ETF. The reallocated capital flowed into traditional assets like TSMC, Microsoft, and gold. Other Ivy League endowments showed varied strategies: Brown and Dartmouth maintained Bitcoin positions, with Dartmouth making a nuanced shift by moving Ethereum exposure to a staking ETF and adding a Solana staking ETF to capture yield. Hedge fund Jane Street significantly reduced Bitcoin ETF holdings, locking in profits, while Wells Fargo increased its Ethereum stake. Overall, institutions are deploying traditional capital market tactics—buying, selling, hedging, and rotating—within crypto via spot ETFs. The Q2 reports will be crucial to determine if Harvard's retreat is an outlier or the start of a broader trend among endowments.

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

How Did Institutions Adjust Their Crypto Asset Holdings in Q1? Who Increased and Who Exited?

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Blockchain Capital Partner: Most People Have a Narrow Understanding of the On-Chain Economy

Author Spencer Bogart, a partner at Blockchain Capital, argues that most people have a narrow view of the on-chain economy, seeing it primarily as a faster, cheaper version of existing financial systems. While this represents a significant opportunity, he believes it's only a small part of the story. Bogart compares the current state of crypto to the early internet, where email was the obvious "faster mail" application. The truly transformative categories—like search, social media, and cloud computing—were entirely new and unimaginable beforehand. Similarly, the most profound innovations in crypto will not be incremental improvements but entirely new categories enabled by the core properties of public blockchains: atomic execution, shared global state, programmable custody, and composability. He cites the "flash loan" as a prime example of a "new verb"—a financial action structurally impossible before programmable assets and atomic settlement. It allows for uncollateralized, trustless borrowing of any size, provided repayment occurs within the same transaction, enabling novel strategies like arbitrage and collateral swaps. Bogart admits the difficulty in precisely predicting these future innovations, as human imagination tends to extrapolate from the past. He posits that the most exciting applications in ten years will be things that don't exist today and have no precedent—products only possible in a global, composable, always-on environment with programmable assets. While the exploration of this vast design space will involve many failures, the potential for transformative, category-defining breakthroughs is what makes the next decade so promising.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Blockchain Capital Partner: Most People Have a Narrow Understanding of the On-Chain Economy

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Cloud PC Gets a Second Chance, Google/Alibaba/Microsoft Battle for Cloud AI Dominance

Google unexpectedly announced "Android Computer," a new high-end productivity-focused PC series, positioning cloud AI as its core rather than an add-on. This move signals a potential revival for the "cloud computer" concept in the AI era. The article argues that current "AI PCs" are essentially traditional Windows machines with AI features grafted on, heavily reliant on cloud AI for complex tasks due to limited local consumer-grade hardware capabilities. This reliance raises questions about the value of premium local AI hardware. Cloud computers, which struggled with latency-sensitive applications like cloud gaming, are seen as a natural fit for AI PCs due to AI's higher tolerance for response time. Google's Android Computer deeply integrates AI (powered by its Gemini model) into the OS interface, making it contextually available. Its hardware-agnostic approach (supporting both x86 and ARM chips) further underscores the shift towards cloud-centric AI. Other players are adapting: Cloud service providers like Alibaba are enhancing their AI cloud computer offerings; chipmakers (Intel, AMD) are focusing on data center AI chips; traditional PC brands are adding AI software layers; and Apple is leveraging its ecosystem and affordable hardware. Microsoft is defining AI PC standards, embedding Copilot (powered by GPT and Bing) into Windows, and also relying on cloud AI. In conclusion, Android Computer challenges the traditional PC form factor by proposing a "light local, heavy cloud" model. This approach appears promising amid rising hardware costs and local compute bottlenecks. The future PC market will involve a multifaceted competition around cloud integration, OS-level AI, and cross-device ecosystems, potentially redefining the PC as a screen and network conduit to cloud-based AI productivity.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Cloud PC Gets a Second Chance, Google/Alibaba/Microsoft Battle for Cloud AI Dominance

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片