L1 Native Tokens' Final 'Monetary Premium' Is Collapsing!

比推Published on 2025-12-08Last updated on 2025-12-08

Abstract

The monetary premium on Layer 1 (L1) native tokens is rapidly fading as stablecoins increasingly dominate as the preferred medium of exchange (MoE) in on-chain economies. While L1 valuations historically incorporated a monetary premium derived from their use as a store of value (SoV) or MoE, data shows a clear shift. On Ethereum, ETH is no longer the primary MoE; stablecoins like USDC and USDT now lead in on-chain transaction volume and top Uniswap pools. A similar trend is observed on L2s like Arbitrum. On Solana, SOL remains the primary MoE due to platforms like Pumpfun and Raydium using it as a quote currency, but USDC is gaining significant traction, especially with new launchpads like MetaDAO adopting it as the default pairing asset. On BNB Chain, USDT has overtaken BNB in trading volume, which had previously been the dominant MoE. The author argues that the market has chosen stablecoins as the superior on-chain MoE. Attempts by ecosystems to enforce their native token as a quote currency add friction and costs for users with minimal price impact. Improved on-chain UX and liquidity are reducing the historical necessity of using volatile native tokens for transactions. The next wave of users will likely use stablecoins, not native tokens, for everyday exchange, further eroding this monetary premium.

Author: Silvio (@SilvioBusonero)

Original Title: The monetary premium on L1s is fading

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews

The valuation of L1 blockchains is a comprehensive reflection of multiple factors: including cultural narrative (Memetics), network fees, security, and the development of upper-layer applications. Among these, the most underestimated is the so-called "Monetary Premium".

The monetary premium stems from the demand of market participants to use assets as a Store of Value (SoV) or a Medium of Exchange (MoE).

  • Store of Value is directly related to the robustness (lindiness) and degree of decentralization of an asset, so it is not an easy market entry strategy.

  • In contrast, acting as a Medium of Exchange may be easier to achieve. Tokens can serve as the primary method for value exchange and measurement within the blockchain economy.

This is similar to the role of tokens in the Web2 economy:

  • Roblox's in-game token Robux, has strong exchange value.

  • When Meme coins started to grow, people bought SOL to enter and exit Meme trades. As SOL was the default currency on Pump platforms, most traders did not convert assets back to dollars but kept some SOL ready to "ape". A similar situation occurred with ETH during the 2021 NFT boom. A large number of users began using the native asset for transactions, effectively creating the utility of a Medium of Exchange (MoE).

Does the Premium Still Exist?

The answer is: No, this premium is rapidly disappearing. Users are increasingly inclined to use stablecoins for transactions.

Ethereum — Stablecoins Have Become the Medium of Exchange

  • Judging from the on-chain transaction volume of mainstream tokens, Ethereum's native token ETH is no longer the primary medium of exchange it once was.

  • ETH's dominance as an MoE is declining, while USDC and USDT are rising in popularity on transaction volume charts and in top Uniswap liquidity pools.

The situation is similar for L2s like Arbitrum.

Solana — SOL Maintains the Lead, but USDC is Catching Up

  • SOL remains the primary medium of exchange and the highest volume asset on Solana (but USDC is catching up). This is mainly because platforms like Pumpfun and Raydium tend to use SOL as the quote currency, while other platforms (like Meteora) have a mixed situation.

  • However, new launch platforms like MetaDAO are setting USDC as the default paired trading asset.

BNB and USDT Go Hand in Hand

  • From 2021 to 2022, BNB absolutely dominated the role of medium of exchange, but then USDT gained market share and surpassed BNB.

The Market Has Chosen the Medium of Exchange — And It's Stablecoins

There is no such thing as "Onchain Legal Tender" in the on-chain market.

Some projects use a "quote asset" strategy, making their native token the medium of exchange, such as Zora and Virtuals. But in reality, this increases transaction costs for both users and projects, while having minimal impact on the token price itself. Ecosystem tokens can attempt a similar strategy through asset issuance platforms, i.e., requiring quotes in a specific token, but this may not be worth it.

The user experience (UX) and liquidity of the on-chain market are improving: the past monetary premium was also partly due to a lack of alternatives and lower liquidity.

The next batch of billions of users will use the same medium of exchange as in real life (USDC, Euros, etc.).

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7594034

Related Questions

QWhat is the 'monetary premium' in the context of L1 blockchains, and what two primary needs does it stem from?

AThe 'monetary premium' refers to the portion of an L1 blockchain's valuation that comes from its use as a form of money. It stems from the market's need to use the asset as a Store of Value (SoV) and as a Medium of Exchange (MoE).

QAccording to the article, which type of asset are users increasingly preferring to use for on-chain transactions instead of native L1 tokens?

AUsers are increasingly preferring to use stablecoins, such as USDC and USDT, for on-chain transactions instead of native L1 tokens like ETH or SOL.

QOn the Solana blockchain, what is a key reason why SOL remains a primary medium of exchange, and what new trend is challenging this?

ASOL remains a primary medium of exchange on Solana largely because platforms like Pumpfun and Raydium use it as the default quote currency. However, this is being challenged by new launch platforms, such as MetaDAO, which are setting USDC as the default trading pair.

QThe article states that the monetary premium is 'fading'. What two reasons are given for the past existence of this premium?

AThe past existence of the monetary premium was partly due to a lack of other options for users and lower liquidity on-chain. The improving user experience (UX) and liquidity in on-chain markets are contributing to its decline.

QWhat does the author suggest about the next billion users entering the crypto space regarding their preferred medium of exchange?

AThe author suggests that the next billion users will use the same mediums of exchange they use in real life, such as USDC or the Euro, rather than the native tokens of L1 blockchains.

Related Reads

a16z: How Should Crypto Entrepreneurs Understand the CLARITY Act?

a16z: How Crypto Entrepreneurs Should Understand the CLARITY Act? The U.S. Senate Banking Committee's bipartisan vote to advance crypto market structure legislation, specifically the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act, marks a historic moment for the industry. For a decade, a lack of clear U.S. regulation has stifled innovation, created consumer risks, and pushed development overseas. CLARITY aims to end this by establishing clear rules for blockchain networks and digital assets, similar to how the 1933 Securities Act shaped capital formation. The current regulatory patchwork has failed, causing legal confusion and enabling bad actors while hindering responsible builders. CLARITY provides a path forward by clarifying the regulatory roles of the SEC and CFTC, defining whether digital assets are securities or commodities, and establishing oversight for crypto exchanges and consumer protections. Crucially, CLARITY recognizes that blockchain networks are fundamentally different from traditional companies. Networks operate through shared rules and decentralized coordination, not centralized control. Applying corporate frameworks distorts them, leading to value extraction by intermediaries. Blockchain enables truly decentralized networks where value can be distributed to participants. CLARITY is designed to make this viable under U.S. law, allowing builders to operate transparently, raise capital domestically, and focus on long-term innovation without structural compromises due to regulatory ambiguity. The bill's progression follows earlier House efforts like FIT21 and the House CLARITY Act, which received strong bipartisan support. If passed, CLARITY could unlock significant innovation within the U.S., similar to the growth seen after the GENIUS Act for stablecoins, helping the U.S. lead in the digital economy while better combating fraud and abuse.

marsbit15m ago

a16z: How Should Crypto Entrepreneurs Understand the CLARITY Act?

marsbit15m ago

AI Benefits Senior Staff? 40% of CEOs Plan to Cut Junior Positions, Young People's Jobs Are More at Risk

The traditional assumption that senior employees are first in line during layoffs is being inverted in the AI era. A survey of 415 CEOs by Oliver Wyman and the NYSE reveals 43% plan to cut entry-level positions in the next 1-2 years to shift towards a mid-to-senior talent structure, a sharp rise from 17% last year. The logic is that AI excels at automating routine, cognitive tasks typically handled by junior staff (e.g., coding, data review), while the experience and judgment of senior employees remain harder to replicate. Research indicates this shift primarily manifests as a hiring freeze for junior roles rather than mass layoffs. Goldman Sachs estimates AI currently nets a loss of about 16,000 US jobs monthly, disproportionately impacting Generation Z concentrated in highly automatable white-collar roles. This raises long-term concerns about a broken talent pipeline, as companies risk having no future senior managers trained internally. Despite the dominant trend, a minority of successful AI adopters, like IBM and Salesforce, are expanding junior hiring, arguing these employees are adept at using and building AI tools. However, most companies are still in early AI deployment phases, with 67% in planning/pilot stages and many reporting returns below expectations. The overarching reality is a weakening of job security across all levels, as organizations reshape for an AI-augmented, leaner future.

marsbit1h ago

AI Benefits Senior Staff? 40% of CEOs Plan to Cut Junior Positions, Young People's Jobs Are More at Risk

marsbit1h ago

Why Zcash Is Back in the Game

The article, an update from ZODL founder Josh Swihart, outlines Zcash's evolution from a "privacy coin" into a broader financial privacy infrastructure. Its core mission is to build a parallel financial system free from mass surveillance, enabling users to privately hold and spend ZEC anywhere. The strategy emphasizes focus: building essential protocol and product (Zodl wallet) capabilities in-house, accelerating development by integrating with external products/chains (e.g., NEAR Intents for swaps), and rejecting non-essential "side quests." Recent progress includes the Zodl iOS 3.4.0 release, updates to Swift/Android SDKs, and testing of in-wallet Coinholder Polling for governance. The Zcash Core team is working on shortening block times, fixing shielding issues, and advancing the Zallet alpha wallet. Upcoming features for Zodl include automatic server switching and multi-currency conversion. The piece highlights a shift towards holistic user adoption, connecting financial privacy, wallet experience, cross-chain utility, and community governance. It concludes with updates on an upcoming ZODL Summit, new team hires, grant applications, and recent positive media coverage, asserting that focused execution is paving the road to a private financial future for billions.

marsbit1h ago

Why Zcash Is Back in the Game

marsbit1h ago

Physical AI is Hot, Some New Thoughts from Me

The term "Physical AI" is gaining significant traction, marking a shift from AI that processes information to AI that understands and interacts with the physical world. Unlike traditional AI confined to screens, Physical AI involves integrating intelligence into robotic bodies to perform tasks in environments governed by gravity, friction, and inertia. The concept, formally defined in a 2020 paper, focuses on creating embodied systems that can complete perception-to-action cycles. 2026 is identified as a pivotal "deployment year," where the focus moves from demonstrations to practical utility. Companies like China's Zhiyuan Robotics have transitioned to live, unscripted factory deployments and announced mass production targets. Internationally, Figure AI, after a major funding round, shifted to its own neural system, while NVIDIA partnered with major industrial robot firms to upgrade millions of existing units with AI capabilities. A key trend is the crossover from the automotive supply chain. Companies like Aptiv and Valeo are entering the Physical AI space, leveraging their expertise in sensors, control systems, and mass production from the autonomous vehicle sector. This "technology spillover" is accelerating development, as seen with Tesla's plans to repurpose automotive production lines for its Optimus robot. The technical breakthrough enabling this progress is the engineering maturity of "world models." Previously theoretical, these AI models can now simulate physical interactions and generate vast, realistic synthetic training data for robots. Innovations from NVIDIA's Cosmos, Ant's LingBot-World, and others have made this capability more accessible, drastically reducing the cost and time needed for real-world data collection. This is driving a fundamental architectural shift in robotics: from the traditional "sense-plan-act" model, reliant on pre-programmed rules, to a "sense-reason-act" paradigm where neural networks reason and make decisions. This change represents a new paradigm where machines understand the world's physics. The competition is intense, with the landscape still forming. While the direction is clear, success will depend not just on AI algorithms but on manufacturing scalability, supply chain resilience, and efficient data strategies, with infrastructure providers potentially capturing significant value in this new era.

marsbit1h ago

Physical AI is Hot, Some New Thoughts from Me

marsbit1h ago

The AI Mirror Behind DeepSeek's Financing: Alibaba to the Left, Tencent to the Right

The DeepSeek financing round exposed a strategic divergence in AI approaches between Alibaba and Tencent. When the AI startup sought external funding, Alibaba reportedly sought "ecosystem control," wanting to deeply integrate DeepSeek's technology into its own platforms like Taobao and Aliyun. Tencent, in contrast, offered a minority financial investment without demands for exclusivity or control over the startup's technical direction, aligning with its historical "open ecosystem" strategy. ByteDance, largely absent from these talks, pursues a third path: massive in-house investment in its own model, Doubao. These choices stem from corporate DNA: Alibaba's e-commerce and cloud heritage favors closed-loop control, while Tencent's social and investment background prefers open connection. Alibaba, with its mature in-house AI stack (Tongyi Qianwen, Pingtouge chips), could afford to walk away. Tencent's self-developed Hunyuan model, though catching up, allows it to engage externally from a position of greater flexibility. The article posits these strategies—Alibaba's "castle" of vertical integration, Tencent's "port" of open ecosystems, and ByteDance's aggressive C-end push—will lead to a sustained, multi-polar competitive landscape in China's AI sector, rather than a single winner-takes-all outcome.

marsbit1h ago

The AI Mirror Behind DeepSeek's Financing: Alibaba to the Left, Tencent to the Right

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片